Monday, February 22, 2016

Grendel is Darth Vader!



            When you think the best villain in cinema the first one that comes to mind for most people is Darth Vader. He is a tall, dark, monstrous figure that wields a dark force, just like Grendel and both of them just love to destroy everything until they are satisfied. But the greatest weakness for great villains is not magic swords, naked men, or The Millennium Falcon, it is backstory. Both Vader and Grendel were completely neutered by telling the stories of their teenage angst, going from awesome villains to whiny teens that we wish would die.

            The next few paragraphs contain spoilers for the entire Star Wars Franchise (minus the new one), so for the five people in the entire world who have never seen Star Wars you have been warned.




            In Beowulf the only thing we know about Grendel is that he is a large ugly monster who kills Danes and destroys a mead hall on a nightly basis just because they were having fun. Same with Vader, all we know is that he the second in command of the Empire in charge of using the Death Star to destroy planets and kill rebels (sound familiar). Then after several years people decided that the villains cannot be evil just because, no every villain needs a reason for being bad so they can be more sympathetic. So the book “Grendel” was written in 1971 and the Star Wars prequels began releasing.

            In “Grendel” they traded excessive religious symbolism for excessive philosophy. The story is told from Grendel’s point of view, which could have been exciting until you realize that Grendel does nothing but complain and be nihilistic. So this great beast that did nothing but destroy and torment is now saying things like “Pity” I moaned, “O pity! Pity!” I wept”, who has ever heard of a monster who cries for pity (Gardner). Grendel continues his angst as he complains about his mother’s love, the dragon and the Shaper’s philosophies, and even his own death.



             Anakin’s (Vader) backstory is extremely similar to Grendel’s almost to the point I feel like there was some plagiarizing going on. Anakin starts out life in a small cave-like hut with only his mother, living as slaves. Then he becomes an angsty teenager complaining that nothing matters, sand is irritating, and that no one believes in him, except an old guy that speaks philosophy and is clearly evil. Anakin then begins to go a little murdering venture starting with wild desert people, then children, and finally everyone he has ever loved. He is stopped when his mentor cuts Anakin’s arm off and lets him fall in lava. So in the end let villains be evil for the sake of evil, and never ruin a good story with prequels or CGI.   


           


4 comments:

  1. Interesting idea. I also agree completely with the idea that backstory tends to ruin good villains. Name one villain who gets a tortured backstory later that remains as intimidating afterwards as they did before said backstory came into existence. You can't because they don't exist. Some come close, but none seem to ever actually achieve that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I can see your point about backstories portraying the not-yet villains as sort of whiny, but I don’t think giving the characters a little backstory destroys the character completely. The backstory offers valuable insight on just why the character in question acts like they do and, while I can agree somewhat on the ineffectiveness of Grendel's backstory, I don’t think that being evil for the sake of being evil makes a good character. Even in the original Beowulf, Grendel still had reasons for killing and he is given a little background (He is a descendant of Cain). You may see their character as whiny and angsty, but they clearly had reasons for acting that way, given their backstory. And sure, maybe the backstory causes the shroud of the villain’s motivations to crumble a bit, but if they are a truly great villain, they will withstand the damage to their names that their backstory may cause.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with your point about back stories changing the way we view villains, but I wouldn't go as far to say that doing this destroys the essence of the character. I think of it as more of a way to emphasize with that villain, that you now understand that even though they are a villain, you know how the origin came to be. With that being said, Darth Vader was never a "true" villain to begin with, his life growing up and the choices he made just had him end up doing what he does but he never truly believed in darkness. The only reason he trained in the powers of the dark side was to find the power that would save his wife who he kept having visions of death for. I feel that the true villains, are the ones you can't feel remorse for even after hearing their backstory, such as Lucifer, or Hannibal Lecter, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like and agree with your points. I feel that the whole backstory thing with characters will impact the way we, as an audience, view them. Especially when it comes to villains, which in turn, can impact the view in a negative way. They may seem softer or less intimidating as their backstory can often times illustrate them as more humane. I feel it can be related to Grendel very well in his backstory shared through the novel we read. As stated, with Darth Vader as well causing a less evil view after review of the backstory. Interesting topic brought up and comparison.

    ReplyDelete