Showing posts with label Frankenstein. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Frankenstein. Show all posts

Monday, February 22, 2016

The Battle of the (Monster) Brains

The Battle of the (Monster) Brains:
Gardner’s Grendel vs. Shelley’s the Monster

Back when monsters were really coming onto the scene, post-Beowulf Grendel but pre-Grendel Grendel, the beginning of Gothic literature produced one of the most famous monsters in literature and society today. This monster, of course, is Mary Shelley’s Monster from Frankenstein (for crying out loud, Frankenstein was the scientist!!) who was thought up during a walk a few days after a scary-story writing contest between her husband, the also famous Percy Shelley, and Lord Byron, while vacationing in Switzerland. The fact that a woman, of all people in the world, created such a terrifying (though that word isn’t the one that would be used these days in reference to the ménage of body parts somehow coming together to create a sentient creature) monster was in itself controversial at the time of Frankenstein’s publication in 1817. Mary not only completed this feat, but she imagined a monster that was compassionate, naive, and strikingly intelligent. Now, there’s quite a bit in those qualities that John Gardner’s portrayal of Grendel can relate to.
            After the Monster first woke upon his creation, he was so confused by the world around him. Grendel experiences this same confusion when he first ventures out into the world beyond his underwater fortress, young, still proud. Both are innocent upon creation, regardless of the circumstances of their genesis. They begin to wander and roam, not realizing that their appearance may scare some people off—but hey, it’s not their fault they didn’t have a mirror to look into first. The both of them begin to realize that there’s a whole world previously unknown to them, though the Monster begins from a point much further behind than Grendel does, as Grendel already knows language and the fundamentals of his cave-life and whatnot.
            They both start learning more about general things in reference to the world—the Monster learning language and certain literature from the DeLacey family/Victor’s pocket books, Grendel from the Dragon and his own contemplations. They begin to struggle while their respective intelligences grow, and, as is typically the case, they feel more alone in the world. The Monster realizes what a family is from watching the DeLaceys, and his unhappiness is rooted deeper with each passing day. Grendel, though he may never realize it himself, wishes he could approach the humans and gain acceptance by them, then ultimately love—exactly what the Monster consciously wishes. Both have experiences with speaking to blind old men, who can’t see the grotesqueness of their appearance, making them the perfect vessels that would (hopefully) then result in the acceptance of the other humans. The Monster ends up being beaten with a walking stick by Felix, certainly not the best of reactions, while Grendel finds himself amused with Ork’s strong devotion while pretending to be the Great Destroyer and silently creeps off. The latter, though he could’ve attempted to use Ork’s blindness to his advantage while appealing to Ork’s pathos and ethos, instead chickens out.
            Both monsters end up on a pathway to revenge. The Monster gets pretty pissed once Victor begins to create a bride like he begged for, then disassembles the parts and refuses to begin again. For this, the Monster pledges to kill everyone Victor loves. Grendel, meanwhile, seems to still be bitter at the whole axe-throwing incident with Hrothgar, along with the simple happiness of the humans, and the fact that they have the company of each other. His destructive tendencies are less organized and thought-out than the Monster’s, but then again he seems to be the more childlike of the two, as his mother was never able to teach him anything like the DeLaceys unknowingly taught the Monster.
            The monsters simultaneously misunderstand and are misunderstood by their creators, setting their entire lives up for a downward spiral when their personal searches for happiness yield the opposite: an existence given over to loneliness.

An Isolated thought?

     Isolation. Sometimes being isolated is good it allows one to be productive and get their work done without distraction for example me writing this post. However sometimes people or things bred in isolation lead to terrible things. When people have questions that are left unanswered it is natural human curiosity that tends to cause them to seek an answer. However in a situation where a human is isolated the answers the find or the manner in which they obtain them may not reach appropriate societal standards. Grendel as a personified monster that John Gardner wrote about is the perfect example of someone or something bred in isolation. As a beast his only knowledge of the world he lives in is separated by what he sees from a third person point of view or what his mother has shown him. Grendel finds his answers about the world in isolation and sadness. The end result of Grendel’s life of isolation results in the fate he meets in Beowulf. However the personification of the beast from Beowulf seems to have some qualities of other “monstrosities” that have appeared in popular literature Grendel’s life of isolation (as perceived by the reader) makes him misunderstood and simply in search for some kind of extraneous knowledge or companionship. Initially he seeks out the dragon who just furthers Grendel’s isolation by telling him that his life is insignificant in comparison to the span of time itself.
            
        Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein exemplifies qualities extremely similar to the personification John Gardner creates in Grendel. The monster as it is simply put, after being brought to “life” wanders from Dr. Frankenstein’s lab in search of any form of answers about himself similar to Grendel. However rather than comparing the Doctor to Grendel’s mother the doctor plays the role of the Dragon from the Epic Poem.  The Dragon and the Doctor alike both explain to the monsters that outside of the world they already know they will find nothing because in the words of the Dragon “humans make roadmaps through hell with their theories”. Naturally both Grendel and the Monster venture to encounter humans and animals alike, each of which react in fear to them. Grendel’s encounter with the Vikings on the mountain, and every time he “visits” the mead hall versus the Monster interacting with the scholars and townsfolk in an attempt to learn about himself.

           
     
   As for what purpose this comparison serves from a literary standpoint, I am not entirely sure, however I do know that as time has passed so have the monsters it has created. Grendel, Frankenstein’s Monster along with most likely many others are built with similar qualities resulting in tragic fates. This further shows the impact Beowulf as an Epic Poem has had on generations of literature around the world. Additionally the use of isolation as a literary feature coupled with the personification of what is perceived to be a monster ultimately results in a plausible argument for labeling Grendel and monsters similar to him as Tragic heroes, mind you this is only a valid argument for the Grendel in John Gardner’s story not the beast portrayed in the original Epic Beowulf.